Belstaff 554 Bag

images Shoulder Bag 554. Belstaff

Large Shoulder Bag 554

peacock

09-14 11:18 AM

Sent more email's this morning about the rally to a no of news papers,radio and TV stations including
Washington Business Journal
Washington City Paper
Washington Post
Washington Times
Washington Diplomat
C-SPAN Radio
National Public Radio (NPR)
Radio America
Voice of America
Public Interest
Fox News Channel
Financial Times
New York Observer
New York Times Syndicate
NBC News
Financial Times
Air America Radio
Newsweek ON AIR
RadioNation
Beaver Press
Blue Mountain Panorama
Box Elder News Journal
Deseret Morning News
Eagle Sentinel
FCCTV
WRC (NBC-4)
WTTG (Fox 5)
WUSA (CBS-9)
Pacifica Radio
ADA News & Notes
American Enterprise
American Prospect
American Spectator
Accuracy In Media

Also sent email's to this list of reporters

mcuban@hd.net,
wnelson@hd.net,
nytnews@nytimes.com,
news-tips@nytimes.com,
washington@nytimes.com,
AmericasNewsroom@foxnews.com,
satya.prakash@hindustantimes.com,
pmagazine@hindustantimes.com,
aditya.ghosh@hindustantimes.com,
Fatherjonathan@foxnews.com,
Drmanny@foxnews.com,
Beltway@foxnews.com,
Myword@foxnews.com,
Bigstory-weekend@foxnews.com,
Bigstoryweekend@foxnews.com,
Bullsandbears@foxnews.com,
Cash@foxnews.com,
Cavuto@foxnews.com,
Fncimag@foxnews.com,
Forbes@foxnews.com,
Friends@foxnews.com,
Feedback@foxnews.com,
Jamie@foxnews.com,
Fncspecials@foxnews.com,
FNS@foxnews.com,
Newswatch@foxnews.com,
Foxreport@foxnews.com,
Atlarge@foxnews.com,
Heartland@foxnews.com,
JER@foxnews.com,
Lineup@foxnews.com,
Ontherecord@foxnews.com,
Oreilly@foxnews.com,
Redeye@foxnews.com,
Special@foxnews.com,
Studiob@foxnews.com,
Hemmer@foxnews.com,
Colonelscorner@foxnews.com,
Housecall@foxnews.com,
Hannity@foxnews.com,
Colmes@foxnews.com,
Letters@newsweek.com,
Customer.Care@newsweek.com,
viewerservices@msnbc.com,
today@nbc.com,
wt@nbc.com,
mtp@nbc.com,
abc.news.magazines@abc.com,
[email]letters@msnbc.com
__________

---

wallpaper Large Shoulder Bag 554

Belstaff Original Brigand 1960

ak_2006

05-15 09:48 AM

Any ways...Good Luck for you and your case is really useful for many of us. Thanks for sharing updates.

---

Belstaff Trialmaster T-h Slim

matreen

07-15 03:20 PM

Then add Immigration Voice as payee
and give address

Immigration Voice
P O Box 1372
Arcadia, CA 91077-1372

don't I need to provide the account number of IV there.?

---

2011 Belstaff Original Brigand 1960

Belstaff Junglemaster H/H Lady

snhn

06-10 11:08 AM

I was hoping against all odds that this was not going to be true when they announced it last month. The iron is that I have been current for the last 2 months now. But when one thing reaches the goal, the other slows down. The damn TSC is was processing June applications while mine is early August. I am hoping that they allocated my file so that when they reach August date, visa would be available for me.

I have EAD and AP and alos have h1 until 2010. in 2010, I would have completed 11 years on H1b visa. My company maybe doing layoffs in the next few months, and I was hoping to get my GC by then. I dont wish to to use EAD because I have a DWI and its safe to stay on H1 for that.

how are the oppourtunities out there for Quality Aussrance/ Analysts.

---

more...

Belstaff 554,Belstaff Bags

GKBest

08-20 08:02 PM

My wife's DL renewal is pending for more than 2 months...When we contacted DMV they said its pending clearance from DHS (homeland security) and it could take take 120+ days to get their approval.

Has anybody encountered this recently?

Thanks

You can ask for a temporary license good for 90 days and re-apply again until you get the DMV card renewal.

---

BELSTAFF,BELSTAFF JACKET

ak_2006

05-15 09:46 AM

Here is the scoop.

from US Congresswoman's office, an immigration specialist spoke to their liaison at the Nebraska Service Center.

Liaison confirmed the following:

1. I-140 approval in September, 2007 (actually 09/04/2009 as I have the hard copy)
2. I-140 revocation in Feb, 2009 ( he has not provided the day of the month, but from LUD I have it strongly pointing to 02/03/2009)
I have not told the Congresswoman's office about the I-140 revocation. Just mentioned that it might have happened as I have left the company.

3. Liaison did confirm that even after the I-140 being withdrawn I am eligible for adjustment thru AC21.

4. Liaison did agree that if the I-140 was revoked within the stipulated time given in AC21, Nebraska’s decision to deny the I-485 may have been in error. (which in my case is true)

Immigration specialist at the Congresswoman's office is going to contact the Director of NSC to review this matter with a supervisor

Unanswered questions:

1. If the Liaison can see that my I-140 is approved on 09/04/2009, why is that the adjudicating officer is responding with a denial on 09/04/2009 and subsequent denial of I-485?
2. Are they both not looking at my information with same interface?

Conclusion:
Atleast in my case it looks deliberate and intentional.

Hi ind_game,

For me, 1. I-140 approval in September, 2007 (actually 09/04/2009 as I have the hard copy) has typo. I think your 09/04/2009 should be 2007.

Please correct.

---

more...

Belstaff Bag 556 -Belstaff -

gctoget

07-28 10:58 PM

Hello everybody,

Just came back from the SoCal IV meeting today which was held at Woodlands,Artesia between 3:00 to 4:30 P.M today. It was nice meeting all the 14 members from IV. I am pretty sure Drona will post the minutes of meeting pretty soon!

Gctoget

---

2010 Belstaff Trialmaster T-h Slim

Shoulder Bag 554. Belstaff

langagadu

09-15 09:07 PM

If you have guts talk on the open forum, why do you give REDs from the back?

Abe Kutte, you did not fill out your profile properly, Moran.
Application mailed date is 03/03/2005 and USCIS Rcvd Date is 04/03/2001.

Looks like you learned in your Ph.d to go backwards in life, Moran.Keep going back and reach 1990, you will get your GC soon. Saat me leke ja tumara sunnysurya ko bi (don't forget to buy bangles for both of you):D:D

By the way I am EB3 and I don't have intentions to port, still I support whoever eligible.



Here is the form you can fill out to express support:
http://spreadsheets.google.com/viewform?key=pfq9i31UpaJcQdUK-1PaKcg&hl=en

View the read only document here:
http://spreadsheets.google.com/ccc?key=pfq9i31UpaJcQdUK-1PaKcg&hl=en

---

more...

Belstaff Bag 554 Will Smith

bharol

08-13 05:20 PM

EB2 requires Masters or 5 years of experience. For those waiting in the queue for more than 5 years should automatically qualify for EB2 because they have 5 years of experience. I dont care the fine wording that says the job needs Masters or 5 years of experience. We should push lawmakers for this option to reduce the huge backlog. What do others think of this option and start a campaign for it?

Experience gained on the same position for which labor was filed, is not counted.
Logic being that it would be seen as on job training and they could have
easily hired a US citizen with less or no experience and trained him as well.

So the experience should be before joining that position as temporary worker.

Person offcourse can chose to quit the company and join another company
and file in EB2.

---

hair Belstaff Junglemaster H/H Lady

Rebelde Belstaff Cazadora

GOTGC

07-25 07:56 AM

We applied in Nebraska in August 2003, Cleared in State on August 29th 2003, Transferred to Chicago DOL on Sept 1st 2003..Got Certfied on Oct 16th 2003...So yes..in some states Labor was VERY Quick.

---

more...

BELSTAFF,BELSTAFF JACKET

vvrmurthy

09-01 10:21 PM

Arrived in Jul 1999. Worked for a consulting company till July 2000 as consultant (client - a major computer server maker). Joined the client July 2000. Even now, same job, same designation. Luckily my employer applied for EB3 BEC labor (May 2004). Since it got stuck, my boss convinced exec mgmt to apply for EB 3 PERM in Aug 2006. PERM labor got thru in Nov 2006. PERM based I-140 got thru in March 2007. Applied for I-485 in July 2007. BEC labor came thru in Oct 2007. Filed I-140 for BEC labor and it got thru in Feb 2008. Interfiled and now PD on I-485 is May 2004 (EB3 - India).

On some site there was a way to know how many are ahead of me, given my PD, my nationality and my category. And looks like some 25,500+ EB3 cases are ahead of me.. Some 10+ years... Honestly, life has more to it than a colored card... let us move on with life... I will not allow the card to determine (ruin) my life...!!!!

---

hot Belstaff 554,Belstaff Bags

Belstaff Roadmaster Man

garry_kay

06-20 12:20 PM

Finally I got my lawyer to start an inquiry at the Atlanta PERM center. My case is pending since Feb 07.

Do you know if you got an audit? Any idea about how they decide to do audits?

---

more...

house Belstaff shoulder Will Smith

Large Shoulder Bag 554

chanduv23

05-15 09:52 PM

Looks like the effect of congressional office. I have soft LUDs on my I-485 and second MTR on 05/15/2009

Well, there you go. I am sure your congress liason will give you some good news next week.

---

tattoo BELSTAFF,BELSTAFF JACKET

Belstaff 554 Shoulder Bag

GayatriS

01-05 08:06 PM

I have been confused by some of the things Professor Wadhwa says -- being opposed to H1 visas and saying there are no shortages of engineers. I saw this video on Youtube which explained everything to me. He is acting like a true American -- like we should once we become citizens. He is advising America on how they can stay competetive -- like all of us want for this great country. But he is also saying that the real solution is for America to welcome immigrants as permanent residents rather than on temporary visas.

Now I understand his message -- if you want to bring in the best from all over the world, bring them here on green cards -- not H1 visas. I also read one of his interviews where he said he was concerned about how H1 workers were taken advantage of and how they lived in immigration limbo. He really does care about doing what is right for all of us.

I totally totally agree with Professor Sahib! I wish the government listens to him. What he is saying is good for everyone. As Indians we want America to succeed and prosper and we want to be a big part of the reason they prosper.

Please see this and give it a good review -- http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bvqqYDmLgjY

Gayatri

---

more...

pictures Belstaff Bag 556 -Belstaff -

Belstaff 554 Shoulder

digital2k

08-08 09:43 PM

*

---

dresses Belstaff Roadmaster Man

a baby ag for dads than

amitjoey

07-05 05:08 PM

Can you please tell me the senators office you called so that I can call them too ..:) more calls the better

CALL your state senators. State senators are interested in listening from people who reside in their respective states, Cause they technically represent them. So they want to hear what affects their constituents.
Call your state senators first, then call your house reps, (remember logfren is a house rep) and then the others.

---

more...

makeup Belstaff Bag 554 Will Smith

Belstaff shoulder Will Smith

rongha_2000

04-30 03:57 PM

They are done with the hearing?? WTF???? Have they got any fruitful information out of it? I feel so deceived..!! I think its all a farse..

Damn u USCIS and Damn u congress who hold our cause hostage to those illegal immigrants.
Jeez, they are done. I am freaking dumbstruck for the sheer lack of substance in the discussion. Gosh, what a waste of tax-payers money!!

---

girlfriend Belstaff 554 Shoulder Bag

Belstaff bags

checklaw

07-05 04:05 PM

Curious.

---

hairstyles BELSTAFF,BELSTAFF JACKET

Vincentmolenaar; Belstaff

unseenguy

02-08 05:24 AM

You need to take control of your family. The problem is that you allowed your inlaws to take control of your family. Second problem is that at the time of delivery the girl probably wanted her parents to come to US but you probably called your parents and she didnt like this nor did her parents. But that does not mean her parents will emotionally blackmail her.

1) You should tell your inlaws politely and candidly that they are interfering in your family and that needs to stop. Also communicate with your inlaws through your wife. Do not communicate with them directly. You did not marry them. They are no body to you, legally.

2) Your wife is under immense stress due to baby and parental pressure to control her. Her parents are trying to control your family through her. This is not the time to talk about separation because she has a young baby and she needs you as much as you need your baby. So you have to tell your wife what your inlaws are doing is not acceptable and just be firm that you will not tolerate it if she wants to live with you. And let her choose between her parents and you. This will be hard but you have to show some mental toughness.

3) When you got married , you started new family, you moved out of family of your parents. Though you dont have to break up with them, there may be some things that your parents do, that your wife does not like. You might think it is OK for your parents to advise or ask her to do things in certain fashion, but, it is NOT OK if she doesn't like it. She is a matured adult and can take care of her new family. So if you wish good of your parents, you have to "keep them at a safe distance." They should not interfere in your affairs.

4) You both husband and wife, need to handle each others parents in a matured way without insulting them. Both of you cant change your biological parents, but you can handle them diplomatically without insulting.

If this doesnt work, and you really want to separate, just tell your wife, that to allow things to cool down, you can live some place else for 3 months and assure her that you will take care of her and the baby. That will send a very clear message to your inlaws of the things to come. You just cant threaten to separate and run away.

Last, I do not know again how you treat your wife and inlaws. I dont mean to judge but do you treat them right? Why are they so desperate in this situation? Also I do not know any money transactions you have with inlaws, but, I would say, its not a good idea to involve inlaws in any kind of money. You invite 50% problems there.

Also I am confused, are you living in India or US?

---

for_gc

10-01 04:22 PM

This is how this law is written. The limit of 140K is for a fiscal year. With next year having its own quota.

USCIS cannot change the law.

This makes sense as well. Let us say if we had this limit for all of ten years in the past and only some of them hit the limit, then we will have this revolving balance which will keep getting carried forward and may total to 500000 or so by now.

No, thats not the intent of the law which is to restrict immigration in a given category in a given year.

---

pshah177

09-11 04:05 PM

Can't make it to the rally, but here's my minuscule contribution...

$100
Google Order #652610300768677

Good luck to us all. IV has been a great community so far...

---